Comparison of quality and interpretation of newborn ultrasound screening examinations for developmental dysplasia of the hip by basically trained nurses and junior physicians with no previous ultrasound experience.

BACKGROUND: We are obliged to give babies the chance to profit from a nationwide screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip in very rural areas of Mongolia, where trained physicians are scarce. This study aimed to compare the quality and interpretation of hip ultrasound screening examinations performed by nurses and junior physicians. METHODS: A group of 6 nurses and 6 junior physician volunteers with no previous ultrasound experience underwent Graf's standard training in hands-on practice. Newborns were examined before discharge from the hospital, according to the national guideline. Two standard documentation images of each hip were saved digitally. The groups were compared on the proportion of good quality of sonograms and correct interpretation. Two Swiss supervisors' agreed diagnosis according to Graf was considered the final reference for the study purposes. RESULTS: A total of 201 newborns (402 hips or 804 sonograms) were examined in the study, with a mean age of 1.3±0.8 days at examination. Junior physicians examined 100 newborns (200 hips or 400 sonograms), while nurses examined 101 newborns (202 hips or 404 sonograms). The study subjects of the two groups were well balanced for the distribution of baseline characteristics. The study observed no statistically significant difference in the quality of Graf's standard plane images between the providers. Eventually, 92.0% (92) of the physician group and 89.1% (90) of the nurse group were correctly diagnosed as "Group A" (Graf's Type 1 hip) or "Non-Group A" hips (p = 0.484). The most common errors among the groups were a missing lower limb, wrong measurement lines, and technical problems. CONCLUSION: Our study provides evidence that while there might be a trend of slightly more technical mistakes in the nurse group, the overall diagnosis accuracy is similar to junior physicians after receiving standard training in Graf's hip ultrasound method. However, after basic training, regular quality control is a must and all participants should receive refresher trainings. More specifically, nurses need training in the identification of anatomical structures.

Validation of self-reported cardiovascular problems in childhood cancer survivors by contacting general practitioners: feasibility and results.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies often rely on self-reported health problems and validation greatly improves study quality. In a study of late effects after childhood cancer, we validated self-reported cardiovascular problems by contacting general practitioners (GPs). This paper describes: (a) the feasibility of this approach; and (b) the agreement between survivor-reports and reports from their GP. METHODS: The Swiss Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (SCCSS) contacts all childhood cancer survivors registered in the Swiss Childhood Cancer Registry since 1976 who survived at least 5 years from cancer diagnosis. We validated answers of all survivors who reported a cardiovascular problem in the questionnaire. Reported cardiovascular problems were hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, stroke, thrombosis, and valvular problems. In the questionnaire, we further asked survivors to provide a valid address of their GP and a consent for contact. We sent case-report forms to survivors' GPs and requested information on cardiovascular diagnoses of their patients. To determine agreement between information reported by survivors and GPs, we calculated Cohen's kappa (κ) coefficients for each category of cardiovascular problems. RESULTS: We used questionnaires from 2172 respondents of the SCCSS. Of 290 survivors (13% of 2172) who reported cardiovascular problems, 166 gave consent to contact their GP and provided a valid address. Of those, 135 GPs (81%) replied, and 128 returned the completed case-report form. Survivor-reports were confirmed by 54/128 GPs (42%). Of the 54 GPs, 36 (28% of 128) confirmed the problems as reported by the survivors; 11 (9% of 128) confirmed the reported problem(s) and gave additional information on more cardiovascular outcomes; and seven GPs (5% of 128) confirmed some, but not all cardiovascular problems. Agreement between GPs and survivors was good for stroke (κ = 0.79), moderate for hypertension (κ = 0.51), arrhythmias (κ = 0.41), valvular problems (κ = 0.41) and thrombosis (κ = 0.56), and poor for coronary heart disease (κ = 0.15) and heart failure (κ = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Despite excellent GP compliance, it was found unfeasible to validate self-reported cardiovascular problems via GPs because they do not serve as gatekeepers in the Swiss health care system. It is thus necessary to develop other validation methods to improve the quality of patient-reported outcomes.

The Role of Wearable Sensors in the Future Primary Healthcare - Preferences of the Adult Swiss Population: A Mixed Methods Approach.

Wearable sensors have the potential to increase continuity of care and reduce healthcare expenditure. The user concerns and preferences regarding wearable sensors are the least addressed topic in related literature. Therefore, this study aimed first, to examine the preferences of the adult Swiss population regarding the use of wearable sensors in primary healthcare. Second, the study aimed to explain and learn more about these preferences and why such wearable sensors would or would not be used. An explanatory sequential design was used to reach the two aims. In the initial quantitative phase preferences of a nationwide survey were analyzed descriptively and a multivariable ordered logistic regression was used to identify key characteristics, that influence the preferences. In the second phase, eight semi-structured interviews were conducted. The cleaned study sample of the survey included 687 participants, 46% of whom gave a positive rating regarding the use of wearable sensors. In contrast, 44% gave a negative rating and 10% were neutral. The interviews showed that sensors should be small, not flashy and be compatible with everyday activities. Individuals without a current health risk or existing chronic disease showed lower preferences for using wearable sensors, particularly because they fear losing control over their own body. In contrast, individuals with increased risk or with an existing chronic disease were more likely to use wearable sensors as they can increase the personal safety and provide real-time health information to physicians. Therefore, an important deciding factor for and against the use of wearable sensors seems to be the perceived personal susceptibility for potential health problems.

Impact of primary care physicians working part-time on patient care: A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of primary care physicians (PCPs) are reducing their working hours. This decline may affect the workforce and the care provided to patients. OBJECTIVES: This scoping review aims to determine the impact of PCPs working part-time on quality of patient care. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Peer-reviewed, original articles with either quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods designs, published after 2000 and written in any language were considered. The search strings combined the two concepts: part-time work and primary care. Studies were included if they examined any effect of PCPs working part-time on quality of patient care. RESULTS: The initial search resulted in 2,323 unique studies. Abstracts were screened, and information from full texts on the study design, part-time and quality of patient care was extracted. The final dataset included 14 studies utilising data from 1996 onward. The studies suggest that PCPs working part-time may negatively affect patient care, particularly the access and continuity of care domains. Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction seem mostly unaffected or even improved. CONCLUSION: There is evidence of both negative and positive effects of PCPs working part-time on quality of patient care. Approaches that mitigate negative effects of part-time work while maintaining positive effects should be implemented.

The effect of the general practitioner as the first point of contact for care on the satisfaction with health care services in persons living with chronic spinal cord injury: A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the effect of having a general practitioner (GP) as a first point of contact for care on the satisfaction with care services in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI), and how this effect is related to socio-demographic and health-related factors. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional survey conducted within the framework of the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study Community Survey 2017. Outcome measures comprised three aspects of care (treatment with respect, understandability of explanations, and involvement in decision-making) and satisfaction with GP care and SCI centres. Information was grouped by first contact of care (GP or SCI specialist) and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Out of 3,959 invitees, 1,294 participants (33%) completed the survey. No significant association was found between the three aspects of care and the first contact of care. Persons who first contacted a GP and lived within a 10-minute travel distance to the GP practice were significantly less likely to be satisfied with their GP care (-5.7 percentage points, CI 95% = -10.7, -0.7), as compared to those living farther away. Persons who first contacted a GP rather than an SCI specialist were more likely to be satisfied with their GP care if married (7.1 percentage points, CI 95% = 1.4, 12.7), employed (6.6 percentage points, CI 95% = 0.9, 12.3), had a high social status (11.0 percentage points, CI 95% = 2.0, 20.1), or had tetraplegia (10.8 percentage points, CI 95% = 3.6, 18.1). For the same group, satisfaction with SCI centres was significantly higher in persons with good (10.1 percentage points, CI 95% = 0.1, 20.1) or very good health (8.2 percentage points, CI 95% = 1.0, 15.4), as compared to those with poor health. CONCLUSION: The majority of participants were satisfied with the services offered by their first contact point for care, with variations due to factors endogenous to the participants. Socio-demographic and health-related factors should be integrated into health care planning strategies and improvement initiatives to ensure equitable access and better quality of health care services.

How time consuming are general practitioners' home visits? Insights from a cross-sectional study in Switzerland.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, the number of home visits has been decreasing over past decades. Lack of time and long journeys have been reported to hinder general practitioners (GPs) from conducting home visits. In Switzerland also, home visits have declined. Time constraints in a busy GP practice could be one reason. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the time requirements of home visits in Switzerland. METHODS: A one-year cross-sectional study involving GPs from the Swiss Sentinel Surveillance System (Sentinella) was conducted in 2019. GPs provided basic information on all home visits performed throughout the year and additionally detailed reports of up to 20 consecutive home visits. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were run to identify factors affecting journey and consultation duration. RESULTS: In total, 95 GPs conducted 8489 home visits in Switzerland, 1139 of which have been characterised in detail. On average, GPs made 3.4 home visits per week. Average journey and consultation duration were 11.8 and 23.9 minutes, respectively. Prolonged consultations were provided by GPs working part-time (25.1 minutes), in group practice (24.9 minutes) or in urban regions (24.7 minutes). Rural environments and short journey to patient's home were both found to lower the odds of performing a long consultation compared to a short consultation (odds ratio [OR] 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-0.44 and OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.46-0.77, respectively). Emergency visits (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.21-4.01), out-of-hours appointments (OR 3.06, 95% CI 2.36-3.97) and day care involvement (OR 2.78, 95% CI 2.13-3.62) increased the odds of having a long consultation. Finally, patients in their 60s had markedly higher odds of receiving long consultations than patients in their 90s (OR 4.13, 95% CI 2.27-7.62), whereas lack of chronic conditions lowered the odds of a long consultation (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.00-0.43). CONCLUSION: GPs perform rather few but long home visits, especially for multimorbid patients. GPs working part-time, in group practice or in urban regions devote more time to home visits.

Improving collaboration between specialists and general practitioners in services for individuals with chronic spinal cord injury living in rural areas of Switzerland: Baseline results from the SCI-Co study.

CONTEXT/OBJECTIVE: Strategies to combine primary and specialized care are crucial to meet the needs of individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) located in rural areas. We explored the collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and SCI specialists who will participate in an intervention study to improve their collaboration. DESIGN: A questionnaire survey from August to October 2020. SETTING: Primary Care, Specialized SCI care. PARTICIPANTS: Eight GPs and 13 SCI specialists. INTERVENTIONS: Baseline results from the SCI-Co study. OUTCOME MEASURES: N/A. RESULTS: Overall, satisfaction ratings for the collaboration between GPs and SCI specialists were high, and all physicians agreed that they work together well. Especially, SCI specialists were satisfied in collaborating with GPs. Despite Switzerland's fragmented primary and secondary care system, only a few physicians reported about issues with delays and waiting lists. While GPs wanted to improve the quality of their referral, most SCI specialists reported being content with it. GPs were also discontent about discharge organization by specialists. CONCLUSION: Satisfaction with collaboration was high, both in GPs and specialists. Areas for improvement include discharge and referral processes.

Why Do Community-Dwelling Persons with Spinal Cord Injury Visit General Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Study of Reasons for Encounter in Swiss General Practice.

Purpose: In a country of free selection of providers, general practitioners (GPs) remain the most visited health-care professionals by the vast majority of persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Switzerland; yet, little is known about these contacts. The study aims to explore reasons for encounters (RFEs) in general practice, and their relationships to first-contact of care (GP or specialist) and GP's competence in managing SCI-specific problems. Patients and Methods: Cross-sectional study from baseline data of non-randomized controlled trial. Persons with SCI in the chronic phase and living in Swiss rural communities were invited. Participants were asked about RFEs (reasons and health problems) of their last visit to a GP. RFEs were coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC-2), and analyzed according to first-contact and participants' ratings of GPs' competence in managing SCI-specific problems. Results: Out of 395, 226 (57%) persons participated, of which 89% have reported 2.1 (SD ±1.4) RFEs and 2.4 (±1.7) health problems per GP visit, on average. Participants visited GPs for medications (49%), urgent medical problems (33%) and follow-up (30%). Most RFEs were related to general/unspecified problems (65%). Persons whose first contact was a specialist were more likely to visit GPs for medications (Specialist = 60% vs GP = 42%). There were no associations between RFEs and the perceived GP's competence at P < 0.05. Conclusion: Irrespective of first contact of care, persons with SCI visit GPs for medication, urgent issues, and follow-up care, and more often for general problems than for secondary health conditions. Strengthening collaboration between GPs in rural communities and specialized centers is recommended; promoting such a connection potentially aids GPs in meeting their information needs for managing secondary health conditions and improving the quality of SCI care for this population.

Improvement Strategies for the Challenging Collaboration of General Practitioners and Specialists for Patients with Complex Chronic Conditions: A Scoping Review.

Introduction: Coordination of healthcare professionals seems to be particularly important for patients with complex chronic disease, as they present a challenging interplay of conditions and symptoms. As one solution, to counteract or prevent this, improving collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and specialists has been the aim of studies by linking or coordinating their services along the continuum of care. This scoping review summarises role distributions and components of this collaboration that have potential for improvement for the care of patients with complex chronic conditions. Methods: Scoping review as a knowledge synthesis for components of collaboration and role distributions between medical specialists and GPs in intervention studies. The PubMed database was searched for literature from 2010-2020. Results: Literature search and reference screening generated 2,174 articles. 30 articles originating from 22 unique projects were included in our synthesis. In the interventions to improve collaboration, the GP is most commonly in charge of patient management and extends the scope of practice. The specialist provides support when needed. Clear definition of roles, resources for knowledge transfer and education from specialists are commonly utilised interventions. Typically, combinations of process and system changes addressing communication and coordination issues are applied. Most interventions improve provider and patient satisfaction, health outcomes, and reduce care fragmentation. Conclusion: This review showed that interventions to improve collaboration between GPs and medical specialists seem promising. Further efforts should be made to test and apply the findings systematically in broad clinical practice.

Accuracy of Trained Physicians is Inferior to Deep Learning-Based Algorithm for Determining Angles in Ultrasound of the Newborn Hip.

PURPOSE: Sonographic diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip allows treatment with a flexion-abduction orthosis preventing hip luxation. Accurate determination of alpha and beta angles according to Graf is crucial for correct diagnosis. It is unclear if algorithms could predict the angles. We aimed to compare the accuracy for users and automation reporting root mean squared errors (RMSE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used 303 306 ultrasound images of newborn hips collected between 2009 and 2016 in screening consultations. Trained physicians labelled every second image with alpha and beta angles during the consultations. A random subset of images was labeled with time and precision under lab conditions as ground truth. Automation predicted the two angles using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The analysis was focused on the alpha angle. RESULTS: Three methods were implemented, each with a different abstraction of the problem: (1) CNNs that directly learn the angles without any post-processing steps; (2) CNNs that return the relevant landmarks in the image to identify the angles; (3) CNNs that return the base line, bony roof line, and the cartilage roof line which are necessary to calculate the angles. The RMSE between physicians and ground truth were found to be 7.1° for alpha. The best CNN architecture was (2) landmark detection. The RMSE between landmark detection and ground truth was 3.9° for alpha. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of physicians in their daily routine is inferior to deep learning-based algorithms for determining angles in ultrasound of the newborn hip. Similar methods could be used to support physicians.

Role distribution and collaboration between specialists and rural general practitioners in long-term chronic care: a qualitative study in Switzerland.

INTRODUCTION: This study explores general practitioners' (GPs') and medical specialists' perceptions of role distribution and collaboration in the care of patients with chronic conditions, exemplified by spinal cord injury. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with GPs and medical specialists caring for individuals with spinal cord injury in Switzerland. The physicians we interviewed were recruited as part of an intervention study. We used a hybrid framework of inductive and deductive coding to analyse the qualitative data. RESULTS: Six GPs and six medical specialists agreed to be interviewed. GPs and specialists perceived the role of specialists similarly, namely as an expert and support role for GPs in the case of specialised questions. Specialists' expectations of GP services and what GPs provide differed. Specialists saw the GPs' role as complementary to their own responsibilities, namely as the first contact for patients and gatekeepers to specialised services. GPs saw themselves as care managers and guides with a holistic view of patients, connecting several healthcare professionals. GPs were looking for relations and recognition by getting to know specialists better. Specialists viewed collaboration as somewhat distant and focused on processes and patient pathways. Challenges in collaboration were related to unclear roles and responsibilities in patient care. CONCLUSION: The expectations for role distribution and responsibilities differ among physicians. Different goals of GPs and specialists for collaboration may jeopardise shared care models. The role distribution should be aligned according to patients' holistic needs to improve collaboration and provide appropriate patient care.

Shared responsibility between general practitioners and highly specialized physicians in chronic spinal cord injury: Study protocol for a nationwide pragmatic nonrandomized interventional study.

INTRODUCTION: To improve the continuity of care for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in peripheral areas, collaboration between general practitioners (GPs) and specialists is needed. This pragmatic non-randomized interventional study assesses feasibility and effectiveness of a new primary care model based on this collaboration. METHODS: The intervention is medical education on SCI related topics offered by specialists to GPs practicing in rural areas. Outcomes are assessed and analyzed in physicians and patients. Group allocation of persons with SCI follows intention-to-treat principle with intervention group being those in close proximity to a participating GP. RESULTS: It is expected that ten GPs and sixteen specialists will take part in the study's intervention. An average difference in "Doctor's opinion on collaboration questionnaire" score (mean 44; SD ± 12) from baseline after two years post-intervention in the group of participating GPs is hypothesized at P-value level <0.05; meanwhile, the control group remains at an average score of 56. Of persons with SCI (n = 395), 230 are expected to take part in the study at baseline. An average modified "Spinal Cord Injury-Secondary Conditions Scale" change in score from baseline to 24 months post intervention is expected to fall from 12.0 to 9.0 in the intervention group and to stay at 12.0 in the control group. CONCLUSION: The study aims to improve patients' outcomes and providers' experience with delivery of care for persons with SCI, as compared to current best practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04071938. Registered August 28, 2018, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04071938.

Frequency of home visits where general practitioners are exposed to a problem different from that foreseen - a Swiss cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: When a home visit is considered, patients' suspected health problems are important for correct triage, the decision for or against the visit and allocation of the visit to a general practitioner (GP) or a nurse practitioner. Misjudgment might lead to suboptimal patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of suspected health problems (based on pre-visit assessments) by comparing them with the actual health problems (post-visit assessments) and investigating associated factors. METHODS: GPs of the Swiss Sentinel Surveillance Network (Sentinella) reported pre-visit and post-visit assessments and patient characteristics for up to 20 consecutive home visits, which they conducted in 2019. Using multivariable logistic regressions, we investigated associations between patient and clinical factors and unconfirmed suspected health problems from pre-visit assessments and unforeseen actual health problems from post-visit assessments. RESULTS: Overall, 114 GP practices participated. The GPs reported 1496 patient visits with a total of 1789 and 1762 health problems from pre-visit and post-visit assessments, respectively, that were included in the analysis. Musculoskeletal and circulatory problems were the most common in patients receiving home visits. The health problems from pre-visit and post-visit assessments were unconfirmed and unforeseen in15% and 13% of the cases, respectively. Older age (odds ratio [OR] 1.1 in 10-year steps; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.0-1.3) and urgent visits (OR 1.7 compared with regular visits; 95% CI 1.1-2.6) showed a trend for more unforeseen health problems. CONCLUSION: When home visits were conducted, about one out of seven health problems from pre-visit and post-visit assessments were unconfirmed and unforeseen. Particularly when patients were older or visits were urgent, there were higher odds of unconfirmed and unforeseen health problems.These results should be considered when triaging patients.

First contact of care for persons with spinal cord injury: a general practitioner or a spinal cord injury specialist?

BACKGROUND: Although general practitioners (GPs) are generally considered as the first point of contact for care, this may be different for persons with complex conditions, such as those with spinal cord injury (SCI). The objective of this study is to understand the differences in long-term care provision by GPs and SCI-specialists, by examining (1) the first contact of care for SCI health problems, (2) the morbidity profile and use of health-care services in relation to first contact, and (3) the factors associated with the choice of first contact. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study based on data derived from the Swiss Spinal Cord Injury Cohort Study Community Survey 2017, the main outcome measure was the reported first contact for SCI-specific care. This information was analysed using the chi-square test and logistic regression analysis of groups based on patient characteristics, use of health-care services and secondary health conditions assessed using the Spinal Cord Injury Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS). RESULTS: Out of 1294 respondents, 1095 reported their first contact for SCI-specific care; 56% indicated SCI-specialists and 44% specified GPs. On average, participants who first contacted a GP reported higher number of GP consultations (5.1 ± 5.2 vs. 3.9 ± 7.2), planned visits to ambulatory clinics (3.7 ± 7.3 vs. 3.6 ± 6.7) and hospital admissions (GP, 1.9 ± 1.7 vs. 1.5 ± 1.3), but lower number of visits to SCI-specialists (1.7 ± 1.8 vs. 2.6 ± 1.7) and of hospital days (22.8 ± 43.2 vs. 31.0 ± 42.8). The likelihood to contact a GP first was significantly higher in persons ≥75 years old (OR = 4.44, 95% CI = 1.85-10.69), Italian speakers (OR = 5.06, 95% CI = 2.44-10.47), had incomplete lesions (OR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.71-3.35), experiencing pain (OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.04-2.09) or diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.85, 95% CI = 1.05-3.27), but lower for those situated closer to SCI centres (OR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.51-0.93) or had higher SCI-SCS scores (OR = 0.92, 95% CI = 0.86-0.99). CONCLUSION: Age, language region, travel distance to SCI centres, lesion completeness, and occurrence of secondary conditions play a significant role in determining the choice of first contact of care, however there is still some unwarranted variation that remains unclear and requires further research.

Traditional Mongolian swaddling and developmental dysplasia of the hip: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Mongolian traditional swaddling of infants, where arms and legs are extended with a tight wrapping and hips are in adduction position, may lead to abnormal maturation and formation of the hip joint; and is a contributing factor for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). This hypothesis was tested in this randomized controlled trial. METHODS: Eighty newborns with one or two hips at risk of worsening to DDH (Graf Type 2a; physiologically immature hips) at birth were randomized into 2 groups at a tertiary hospital in Ulaanbaatar. The "swaddling" group (n = 40) was swaddled in the common traditional Mongolian method for a month while the "non-swaddling" group (n = 40) was instructed not to swaddle at all. All enrollees were followed up on monthly basis by hip ultrasound and treated with an abduction-flexion splint if necessary. The groups were compared on the rate of Graf's "non-Type 1" hips at follow-up controls as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were rate of DDH and time to discharge (Graf Type 1; healthy hips). In addition, correlation between the primary outcome and swaddling length in days and frequency of swaddling in hours per day were calculated. RESULTS: Recruitment continued from September 2019 to March 2020 and follow-up data were completed in June 2020. We collected final outcome data in all 80 enrollees. Percentages of cases with non-Type 1 hip at any follow-up examination were 7.5% (3/40) in the non-swaddling group and 40% (16/40) in the swaddling group (p = 0.001). There was no DDH case in the non-swaddling group while there were 8 cases of DDH in the swaddling group. The mean time to discharge was 5.1 ± 0.3 weeks in the non-swaddling group and 8.4 ± 0.89 weeks in the swaddling group (p = 0.001). There is a correlation between the primary outcome and the swaddling frequency in hours per day (r = 0.81) and swaddling length in days (r = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Mongolian traditional swaddling where legs are extended and hips are in extension and adduction position increases the risk for DDH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered, ISRCTN11228572 .

Delivery of mobile dental services to dependent elderly people: results from a pilot study in rural Switzerland.

The objective of this pilot study was to provide data on the oral health status and oral health behaviour of care-dependent elderly people in the canton of Uri. The study aimed at assessing whether age and duration of living in a nursing home is associated with dental attendance, whether there is a relationship between age and the DMF-T index, and how high the risk was for participants to develop oral health problems. The study offered mobile dental services to people residing in nursing homes (NHG) and to community dwellers (CDG). Data was collected on demographics, medical history, presence of pain, ability to eat and oral health behaviour by means of a questionnaire. A clinical examination was performed and data on the oral status was collected. Statistical methods were: median tests, linear regressions and descriptive statistics. Uptake of the programme was low. 56 participants were examined. 47 participants (24 females, 23 males, average age 86.3 ± 7.36 years) resided in nursing home, nine participants (seven females, two males, average age 76 ± 12.8 years) were community dwellers. No significant differences were found between frequency of dental attendance and age (p = 0.35) or duration of stay in a nursing home (p = 0.55). The number of decayed teeth (p=0.005), missing teeth (p=0.01), and the DMF-T index (average in NHG = 26.5, CDG = 20.2, p < 0.001) increased, the number of filled teeth (p=0.02) decreased as age increased. Upon calculation of the 'Teamwerk-index', which takes into account oral health behaviour, dental caries, periodontal status, the majority of participants had a medium risk of developing oral health problems. Our pilot study in rural Switzerland provides first results of the oral health status in dependent elderly people. As people age, oral health deteriorates. More attention should be given in order to achieve better oral hygiene maintenance and more regular dental visits, to ensure a better oral health status in dependent elderly people.

Treating insomnia in Swiss primary care practices: A survey study based on case vignettes.

Guidelines recommend cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) as first-line treatment for chronic insomnia, but it is not clear how many primary care physicians (PCPs) in Switzerland prescribe this treatment. We created a survey that asked PCPs how they would treat chronic insomnia and how much they knew about CBT-I. The survey included two case vignettes that described patients with chronic insomnia, one with and one without comorbid depression. PCPs also answered general questions about treating chronic insomnia and about CBT-I and CBT-I providers. Of the 820 Swiss PCPs we invited, 395 (48%) completed the survey (mean age 54 years; 70% male); 87% of PCPs prescribed sleep hygiene and 65% phytopharmaceuticals for the patient who had only chronic insomnia; 95% prescribed antidepressants for the patient who had comorbid depression. In each case, 20% of PCPs prescribed benzodiazepines or benzodiazepine receptor agonists, 8% prescribed CBT-I, 68% said they knew little about CBT-I, and 78% did not know a CBT-I provider. In the clinical case vignettes, most PCPs treated chronic insomnia with phytopharmaceuticals and sleep hygiene despite their lack of efficacy, but PCPs rarely prescribed CBT-I, felt they knew little about it, and usually knew no CBT-I providers. PCPs need more information about the benefits of CBT-I and local CBT-I providers and dedicated initiatives to implement CBT-I in order to reduce the number of patients who are prescribed ineffective or potentially harmful medications.